Feb 16, 2019 6:20 PM
Kanimir and Jaromira in Fabulous
+ Show First Post
Total: 1841
Posts Per Page:
Permalink
Eh, maybe someone should have been concerned when we were babies? It's been fine since we've been able to go into the cash drawer and go shopping. It's stuff like 'she forgets to buy salt', not 'she forgets she has kids and flies to Jamaica for a week'.
Permalink

As long as it works.

Permalink
Works fine.
Permalink

Good. Things should work out for you. 

Permalink
Thank you.
Permalink
So're you.
Permalink
You're welcome!
Permalink

I used to think books in which the protagonist does something stupid for romance were insipid but now I'm starting to empathize. 

Permalink
Please do not do stupid things. It will not enhance your romance.
Permalink

I'm not planning to, the scenarios in the books did seem rather contrived, but I can understand the temptation to, say, choose saving you over preventing a horde of poorly-mythologically-researched primeval beings ravage the earth.

Permalink
Don't do that either! If nothing else I have a family!

Why should they have to be well-researched? Why not iterate on creatures that are made up anyway?
Permalink

The thing is that if you're using mythological creatures you should probably know anything whatsoever about the original myth before slapping the name on a random monster. 

Permalink
How inaccurate are we talking, here, like, did they call something that is clearly a unicorn a "goblin"
Permalink

Not quite that bad--the specific instance I'm thinking of is Disney's Hercules, where in addition to making a satyr not have visible genitalia despite not wearing pants they portrayed the Titans as quasi-mindless monsters ravaging humanity for no apparent reason and Zeus just stepped in because he was Heroic.

Permalink
Oh, here I thought you were talking about some original fantasy novel, not somebody's attempt to directly adapt a myth.

I mean a satyr with pants would look really dumb and one with visible genitalia would not suit a Disney movie.
Permalink

He could have worn a kilt. Or they could have used literally anything other than a satyr.

Permalink
I didn't remember if the satyr was canonical to the myth.
Permalink

In the myth it was a centaur.

Permalink
That'd look even dumber in pants.
Permalink

Yes, but they are also known for any things besides being randy and priapic. 

Permalink
I had to look that up.

Wasn't it only one centaur who was known for things other than that? I mean, probably the same one, but
Permalink

In the original mythology, I think so, but somewhere along the line someone decided centaurs were cool and now they are child friendly in popular media. I can't say the same of satyrs.

Permalink
Has to start somewhere.
Total: 1841
Posts Per Page: