He thinks, for a bit, nervously tapping his pen against the corner of the notebook.
okay so I don't yet have an answer to all of those but i have a better handle on what exactly i'm trying to preserve here
people's minds are who they are. if you change the way someone's mind works, you're just killing them and replacing them with someone else. if you directly control someone's limbs and actions so they can do something you want, you are effectively replacing them with someone else, and if you directly edit their minds to be a certain way, then they're no longer that original person.
but that logic proves too much. there's some leeway for the small amounts of changing that occur over someone's normal life, your concept of "identity" has to be robust to that
i bite a handful of bullets related to this, personally, i think it's not a stretch of the definition to say that the person i was when i was ten is not at all the same person i am right now, even if every intervening step would agree that the previous step was also themselves. so this concept of "identity" isn't a binary, it's a continuum, a fuzzy line that people transit along
i think... i'm not entirely sure how i would feel about having skipped the last eight years of my life and turning ten-year-old me into present-me overnight. it feels sketchy? my intuitions are uncomfortable with it? though given that a set of physically lawful, psychologically regular steps was in fact used to achieve this transition between 10yo!peter and 18yo!peter my intuitions are flexible on this matter
and people who are depressed and take antidepressants might take reach psychological states that they couldn't have reached merely by taking other, non-chemical actions. in a certain sense, the antidepressant is directly editing their minds and turning them into a version of themselves that couldn't be reached otherwise.
Some more tapping while he hums thoughtfully to himself.
and yet i feel like if someone were like "no, i don't want to take antidepressants" and then took them anyway, by force maybe to make the hypothetical easier, and afterwards went "actually that was a good idea and i'm thankful it happened", i still feel really uncomfortable? it feels like we were disrespecting the preferences of depressed!them and effectively forcibly replaced them with a version of themselves that we like more
i'm not sure how seriously i take this intuition, though, 'cause then the action "take an antidepressant" is identity-preserving if and only if it was taken voluntarily, so the intent of the action matters now? and that's bizarre, it's the same action, it has the same effects, whether someone is "the same person" as someone else shouldn't change depending on the intentions of the people taking the action that changes them
this may just be pointing at a different intuition, though, that compounds: in addition to preservation of identity i also care about, mm, "consent" is not exactly the best way to encapsulate it but i think it's a reasonable neighboring concept
that was a lot, does all of that make sense? do you have any questions about it? honestly i might have questions about it, i've never really had reason to go this deep into my thoughts about the ethics of mind-alteration and identity