"I hope that our few remaining members will arrive shortly, but we have limited time and I do not wish to waste it, so I want to go ahead and begin. The first matter is the trial yesterday in which the judge was geased to rule only in accordance with the law. I think the Queen intended to bring about justice, by this, and I think it sufficed to get the result Her Majesty desired from the trial, but I have witnessed it causing great chaos at this convention. If magistrates can be presumed to exercise reasonable judgment, then the laws need be written with clarity and reasonableness, and we can borrow from the laws of other Lawful and Good allied countries," if his committee is full of paladins he can absolutely cater to them, "or borrow from the laws of Old Cheliax. But if judges are bound by magic to be barred from considering context or precedent and using their judgment, then - well, I've seen many committees lost down in the caverns of the Underdark trying to specify every possible thing so that there's no way for a judge even if they possess no common sense at all to misunderstand the job. That doesn't work. There's a reason no legal system works that way. If that is how our judiciary works we cannot benefit from the wisdom of any existing legal system.
I think it is good if judges, especially in prominent cases, are geased not to accept bribes and to rule with wisdom and attention to the law. I do not think that the country's laws can possibly be written so well as to remove the role of common sense.
And so I have proposed this advice to the Queen for this committee to consider:
The laws of Cheliax cannot be written so as to encompass perfectly every possible case or situation. For this reason we are judged by men, not by axiomites, and among the duties of those men is to apply discretion, tradition, context, and common sense. Where geases are employed, they should be employed to prevent bribery, or straightforward abuses of power, and not to restrain judges from making reasonable decisions informed by context, tradition and common sense. No one should be convicted who was doing something the law never intended to prohibit, nor acquitted for conduct that plainly was meant to be illegal, merely because enchantment bars the judge from employing his own judgment.
This might well be what the Queen is already doing - I hope it is - but it's not what people understand her to be doing, and people are desperately trying to write laws on the assumption that they'll be interpreted by hostile mind-controlled literalistic automata, so I think it's important to clarify."