You should call yourselves "The Horror Hunters" because when people hear it they'll assume the whole game long that you're the bad guys but then when it turns out in a third-act twist that you're actually the good guys and people are surprised you can act all indignant because it's right in the name of your organization that you hunt the horrors. 

Thanks, she'll take that under advisement. 

Or call yourselves the Death Eaters. 

She's just going to leave the top of the document blank and circle back to it when she comes up with a name, then.

The Lancers of the Earth
The League of the Fate
The Knights of the Sky
The Exaltation Guardians
The Mountain Soldiers
The Gate Knights
The Limbo Order
The Templars of Blood
The Order of Grit
The Knights of Exaltation
The Order of the Cherub
The Order of the Crest
The Knights of the Fruit
The Fire Shields
The Land Knights
The Maple Helmets
The Rose Squires
The Legion of Judgment
The Legion of Honor
The Order of Giants
The League of the Chain
The League of the Sister
The League of Your Mother
The Templars of the Shadow
The Crow Lancers
The Sanguine Guardians
The Nest Shields
The Blessed Guardians
The Circle of Giants
The Circle of Thunder
The Shields of Courage
The Order of the Faith
The Preservers of the Phoenix
The Soldiers of the Water
The Honor Order
The Moon Custodians
The Dust Soldiers
The Judgment Preservers
The Knights of Solitude
The Custodians of Silver
The Lancers of, heh, Desire
The Legion of the Archangel
The Templars of the Ice
The Preservers of the Isle
The Dusk Knights
The Mother Knights
The Seraphim Legion
The Falcon Lancers
The Order of Solitude
The Circle of Thunder
The Lancers of Valiance

Where are you getting these?

Online generator.

"The Honor Order - Standards of Conduct" goes right at the top of the document. 

Or "HUUURUCAK of the Promised Golden Dawn", for short (and on the stationary).

That's unironically kind of fun to say.

Beneath "The Crepuscular Holy Avenging Knights of the Promised Golden Dawn! - Standards of Conduct" (she'll change it later, but is not adverse to finding levity where levity she can) Kroft writes:

Purpose of this document:

Something something get everyone on the same page, set expectations and reduce conflict, ensure fairness and justice, provide a framework to make decisions less arbitrary and personalistic, promote virtues of (insert virtues here), protect people outside the organization from people inside the organization, protect the people inside the organization from the organization, foster a supportive context to behave ethically and with professionalism, and help the paladins keep from falling, add more maybe or just organize this better and expand on points in a future draft.

You've got to start by telling people what you want to tell them - there's no reason to make that a surprise - but that's for later drafts or just using her mouth (the HUUURUCAK knights aren't very numerous yet) and here's the part that she really wants to write:

These standards of conduct should not be interpreted as all-inclusive: that a thing is against the standards of conduct is an argument that you should not do that thing. That a thing is not against these standards of conduct is in no wise an argument that you should do that thing. If you have to ask, or have to check, whether a particular something is explicitly disallowed by these standards, you should refrain from doing that something.

Cressida Kroft has had this conversation with so many Guardsmen.

It's nice to be able to put it right there in the official standards of conduct. And not have to argue with anyone used to a different way of doing things about whether or not it's appropriate.

...But, because escape clauses are important, she adds,

Unless both of the following attain: a) it is clear with your conscience, b) you have cleared it with the Field Marshall[1] or one to whom he[2] has explicitly delegated that authority[3].

-

1. It's the ranking system she's familiar with. Why overcomplicate things?

2. "He" in the gender-neutral sense.

3. It doesn't even occur to Kroft to write "you have cleared it with your commanding officer". Your commanding officer's area of competency might be limited to leading troops in battle (or conducting criminal investigations or motivating a specific three people to do their jobs or whatever other narrow thing got them promoted to their current position during peacetime). Or they might be a problem-child with a prominent family name - many commanding officers are and you just have to work around that.

And beneath that she'll write: 

Rationale:  

It is impossible to legislate in advance how one should conduct themselves in all possible circumstances. There are, therefore, matters which this document does not address.

Insofar as the standards of conduct are useful and demonstrate sound judgement, it is unfortunate that you may find yourself without access to that sound judgement. 

However: Insofar as these standards of conduct demonstrate sound judgement, an accurate extrapolation of what they would say is an extrapolation of that same sound judgement. 

Corollary: If you can guess what this document would say on a topic if that topic it addressed, you can just do that. Even if it seems arduous, or not to your advantage.

Inscribe a copy of this document on your heart, one more complete than the paper version and which can be consulted at all hours.

There are many things which she can lift straight from the Korvosan Guard's equivalent book - paladin orders shouldn't steal things or lie or make promises they don't have the ability to keep or kick people's dogs unless there is in fact a pressing need. 

But what has her stumped is this:

Paladin orders are supposed to have rules for Lawful Good living. Cressida Kroft has opinions on what constitutes Lawful Good living, but she knows that the thing she tries to be diverges from what other people also considered Lawful Good do. Cressida Kroft's rules for Lawful Good living are likely to be more constraining in places than is necessary for a paladin, in other places they'll be too permissive, else too strict along a conflicting axis...

And it's not like she wants to enforce her idiosyncratic moral code on people who aren't her. (Or, rather, she kind of does want to - but doesn't entirely endorse that desire.) Cressida Kroft feels, for instance, that all else being equal it's Lawful Gooder not to pull the leaves off of trees you're passing by.

Is that true? Does that actually help your alignment? Well, it probably doesn't hurt... and it's not like she's bothered by small acts of waste and destruction because she wants to be Lawful Good. She wants to be Lawful Good because she's bothered by small acts of waste and destruction. 

And if someone isn't bothered by these things, Kroft doesn't want to insist they be her best self. They should try and be their own best self.

(Or, rather, she wants to pin their arms behind their back and make them apologize to the tree, but she's not twelve years old anymore and that she gets affronted on behalf of plants is her problem and she's not going to make it someone else's problem as well and honestly it doesn't bother her (that) much (anymore).)

...But, that seems at odds with legislating morality in advance so that the paladins don't fall.

Wouldn't it be embarrassing if she doesn't put "I'm aware that it's satisfying to snap twigs with your fingers but the tree didn't spend all that time growing those branches out for you to come along and destroy them so unless you actually need the kindling for something" in the rules and turns out that random neuroticisms like that were the one-pound weights which made the difference in her alignment?