So now she's laying down ground rules for her paladin order, apparently.
Was it too much fun?
Do we need to establish a rule against such sinful vices as speed chess, lest Korvosa's paladins fall into Chaos and Evil?
What's his advice? How can she provide moral guidance to people who she statistically expects to need moral guidance, and who want moral guidance from her, when she only knows how to be herself, which is sufficient to ping as Lawful Good in some circumstances but not a complete handbook to the alignment?
...By the way, thanks for existing for her to ask questions at, Olin. She hopes it's not too inconvenient for him.
She'll write everything which seems relevant to her, a sort of Cressida Kroft's Guide to Lawful Good Living, and she'll get some of the other paladins to write their own guides to Lawful Good Living - older ones, who've had the chance to stress-test their moral codes -, and LG non-Paladins like Arbiter Zenderholm, and then she'll combine the overlap and stick that in the Standards of Conduct, and turn the non-overlapping parts into different proven LG "templates" and tell new paladins to pick one or write a new template of their own which a) contains the overlap, and b) seems just as Lawful Good as existing templates to both them and the Field Marshall or whoever the Field Marshall delegates that to.
Or maybe even if it doesn't seem as LG as existing templates? A moral code is a highly personal thing, and there are costs to empowering people established in the order to be too nosy or domineering there.
It's actually my third-favorite class.
Behind rogue and bard.
But clerics are fun too.