She rapidly scribbles things on the whiteboard.
"I am so glad we are talking about this beforehand," she opines.
"So first of all, Gord: the fixity fields currently cover only the solar system we're in. People who want to leave and live completely independently can, and they can also purchase fixity crystals to take with them when they do. We're talking about revising that policy in the face of things like gods that might be able to reverse-engineer fixity crystals just by seeing them, but still. I completely understand that having a single point of failure is a bad idea -- that's also why the vast majority of planets, moon-bases, space stations, etc. are designed such that they would continue functioning without active intervention. People just feel safer when that's true, and usually prefer that when it's cheap."
"And, to be clear -- not everywhere covered by fixity fields is set to shred unknown magic. About 6% of people are standing in a jurisdiction where unknown magic is permitted at the moment, because they like something about being there more than they dislike the idea of potentially being attacked with magic."
"I ordinarily wouldn't move people here at all without their permission, it's just that you all have convinced me that grabbing people from Golarion probably needs to happen in one moment to avoid interference."
She shakes her head.
"But I'm not against leaving dangerous people in Golarion if that is the best option -- both for the people here, but also for them. If this Litch is sufficiently dangerous that having redundant fixity fields across all of the places that people care about isn't going to be sufficient, then so be it. But I don't want to lose sight of the fact that everyone -- even very dangerous Evil people -- still deserve to have a good life. So I don't want to withhold whatever luxuries are safe to offer them."
"The question is ..." she thinks how to phrase it. "Actually, there are several: Are there things we can do to make the people we bring here more safe, at least by default before they opt-out? And once we've done that, does that make things safe enough that we can afford to help everyone? I really hope it does, but maybe it doesn't. In which case, how can we identify and exclude the people who we are not yet sufficiently equipped to safely transport? And then what can we do for them other than bringing them here that will make their lives better?"
"Does that make sense? Does that re-framing help, or am I missing something?"