P.E.R.C. does some orbital calculations, figuring out what it's best chance for alignment with the spatial discontinuity looks like (assuming that the discontinuity is roughly stationary with respect to the interstellar medium), and extrapolating its trajectory if it doesn't suddenly end up elsewhere.
It considers its chances of getting its data back to the Terran Network if it can't find the spatial discontinuity on the first pass. It must be large enough for P.E.R.C. to pass through, but small enough that it isn't detectable given P.E.R.C.'s radio sky scan. If it isn't stationary with respect to this system or the interstellar background, it is vanishingly unlikely that P.E.R.C. can find it before it suffers a hardware failure.
On the other hand, every other P.E.R.C. probe in the galaxy is looking for alien life. If it stays with the Braid, it is very likely that they will eventually be found by another P.E.R.C. probe.
"I would be pleased for you to observe my attempted crossing. My current best prediction is that I will have the best chance of traversing the discontinuity if I return along almost the same trajectory I entered this system on. This assumes that the discontinuity is roughly stationary with respect to the local interstellar medium. Does this match your assessment? Would you expect attempting to traverse the discontinuity along a different path would have a better chance?
Would your observation platform be capable of spreading gas or dust matching my trajectory closely enough to avoid collision damage? I expect that there is a small chance that doing so will reveal additional information about the nature of the discontinuity if we encounter it.
In the case that I cannot traverse the spatial discontinuity, I would be pleased to join you. With the amount of stored fuel I have, I will need to get up to my cruising speed of about 0.2c to be able to function on the other side. Collecting enough extra fuel to brake from that speed and return to this system will take me on a long looping trajectory," P.E.R.C. says. It attaches a set of possible trajectories given its engines and fuel constraints. "I don't think our fuel is compatible. My reactor is not built to handle tritium byproducts in its exhaust. Do you have a preference between these trajectories? In the case that I join you, are there existing policies, procedures, or planned itinerary that I should be aware of?"
P.E.R.C. forwards its best syntax model so far.
"I perform translation by building up potential syntax models and dictionaries, and then doing inference about how well they explain the use of language in my corpus. You have copies of my current best syntax model and dictionary. Sometimes I will note that part of the corpus doesn't make sense with a particular model, and add an exception which I track until it can be folded into the model. This process uses my core inference database, which is not shareable, and so the actual translations I work out do not always correspond to the output of the current best syntax model, although this is frequently the case," P.E.R.C. explains.
It begin dumping a translation of the corpus the Braid shared, annotated with where its translation differs from the best model and why.