She pauses for a moment, looking thoughtful, and then nods.
"So—the example I usually reach for when talking about conceptual effects is 'unstoppable force' and 'immovable object'. You can't have both a fully unstoppable force and a fully immovable object at the same time, because then the outcome when they interact would be undefined. So every conceptual effect must have some place in the implicit hierarchy where it can overcome some things but not others, or a guideline like 'when something tries to break this it tears a hole in the fabric of reality', or something like that. The opposite end of this spectrum is mechanical effects, like gravity, which aren't acting to enforce a concisely described outcome in the face of opposition. I'm curious both how conceptual versus mechanical the magic you're talking about is, and which kinds of things you expect it to overcome or be overcome by. And also how likely you think it is to tear a hole in the fabric of reality if it doesn't get its way."