There are, obviously, this really should go without saying, hundreds upon thousands of books promising to improve your realistic-self-inserts, by offering mnemonics and exercises meant to help you retain knowledge about things an isekai protagonist might need to know. You can look at the statistics about whether authors' characters did in fact remember them right; and what the conditional probability markets said about the chance that the author would've done better with a different book, in case that's just a non-causal correlation in a way the market knows about. If you really care you can even spin up a conditional probability market on yourself.
There are 10-active-day training-camps you can run yourself through, for learning the sort of hands-on knowledge you would need to be the best possible isekai protagonist--though most authors and future authors don't go that far.
But, that said, there is an obvious stumbling-block here to be wary of, when it comes to self-education in order to improve your isekai protagonists.
There is perhaps a certain sketchiness if you-the-author read an isekai-protagonist-self-improvement book about chemistry, and then, what do you know, your story protagonist encounters a chemistry-related problem in the novel you-the-author started writing one week after you virtuously put that chemistry book away and virtuously didn't peek.
To be clear, if for other reasons you've honestly lived your life researching industrial acid synthesis, and then you decide to write a novel about an isekai protagonist who luckily used to work in the chemical industry, using their expertise in an alien economicmagical world, that's universally agreed to be fine and cool. That's the author's real strength that the isekai protagonist is showing off.
But since that's so cool, it would be shameful to try to look that cool, by a sleight-of-hand, when you're not actually that cool. Shameful, and dishonest. Most isekai protagonists, one assumes, would not get a chance to go back in time and read exactly the right book they needed, one week before getting isekaied. So if you read exactly the right book, one week before you start writing the self-insert story, that's a way of making the character look better-read than you'd actually be in a realistically similar situation.
If your isekai protagonist gets unrealistically lucky that way, you declare it explicitly, by mentioning in-story how your protagonist read the same book you did, one week before getting isekaied. To do otherwise would be dishonest and shameful.
One might say that the whole point of this metaliterary trope--once declared to be in force--is to have the isekai protagonist look only as well-prepared as the author actually is. Any impressionable person of the appropriate gender who reads a novel with the blazon of this trope upon its cover, and gets all starry-eyed about how knowledgeable the protagonist seems to be, should not be disappointed when they attempt to date the actual author.