Next Post »
+ Show First Post
Total: 160
Posts Per Page:
Permalink

He spoke against it; he will vote against it. May they bring something he could vote for instead.

Permalink

No. For all the reasons before, and also it would mean putting more nobles in the army and they can be corrosive to chains of command.

Permalink

He doesn’t really care if other people want to have metatitles even though they’re stupid, certainly not enough to break his record of abstaining on every vote. 

Permalink

For, no reason not to. 

Permalink

Against, wizards already cost too much, if they get titles it will be even worse. 

Permalink

For? If it fails Coeliaris might not get to the part about the Hellknights. It's not like he cares very much about who is or isn't a noble.

Permalink

Against, a hundred times over. If a wizard wants to be a noble they should either cultivate sufficient virtues an existing noble is willing to tie their dynasty to them or else perform a sufficiently meritous deed to the state that the crown disburses some of its land to them on the merits.

Permalink

Very suspicious about what this actually does, and whether it gives a ton of third circle wizards a bunch of legal privileges. Against.

Permalink

For. Whatever the silly discount conditions, the money goes to the right place.

Permalink

Even with all the arguments against, they do really need good wizards. And money.

And she could get a title.

For.

Total: 160
Posts Per Page: