"I'm pretty sure it's the jacket," Soph says. "Being... an evil jacket. Um. Scott. Did you know magic is real and I can prove it and if I do prove it will you let Bella destroy your evil jacket without making a scene?"
"Nitidi," says Soph desperately, waving her hand in front of his face.
"There isn't any glitter on you, it doesn't stay. Look - watch. Nitidi."
-possibly also the girl holding it. Now that Scott's focusing on Bella instead of (fake?) glitter, he's confused. How did he not notice her before? He usually goes for the smiling type, but for her he will make an exception. He swipes, and misses again. Damn. How did she do that? That was awesome. "You're good at that..." he says admiringly.
"Oh fucking hell," mutters Bella under her breath. "Hey, you've probably noticed that I kind of have a thing for this jacket," she says at full volume, trying for syrup and getting mostly disgust and exasperation. "Any chance I could, like, keep it?"
"Let me have it and maybe you'll find out."
Bella is rapidly running out of fake niceness, or fucks to give about not making a scene, but the fewer times she needs to rely on blatant nepotism to avoid getting arrested the better.
"Great. Thanks. I'll see you around," says Bella, smiling, and then she lights out at high speed towards the nearest unobserved location in which she can easily start a fire.
I have what I'm 98% certain is the talisman. Are they complicated to destroy, and/or is that a bad idea? Also, how are they created, do I need to go back to whoever originally owned it and shut down his talisman-making operation?
Unless you suspect the talisman to be enchanted with additional protections, separate from its totemic properties, it will be safe to destroy. Fire is the standard for such cases; acid will suffice for most items that are not flammable. A trip to a volcano with a group of hobbits is not required.
I'm fresh out of hobbits, so I'm glad my lighter will cut it.
Are there going to be any lingering effects on the affected girls?
She makes a little firebreak out of rocks and applies lighter to jacket.
I'm not sure I'm explaining that well. Does it make sense?
On an only loosely related note I am about set for you to know where to find me and be more easily accessible.
I appreciate the vote of confidence. (And, as I find e-mail an unreliable indicator of tone, I should add that I do mean that in seriousness.) Take your time, of course, but do let me know if I can do anything to help. For clarity, though: were you expecting 'revealing your location' to coincide with 'a Watcher being sent to you physically' or would you prefer additional time?
Do you hate travel enough that the Watcher being sent to my location could not be you?
I've always known Watching requires travel and have no objection to it. I require more packing time than most, I suppose, as I would be bringing my son. Fortunately, he hasn't yet begun school, and I'm not bound to wait till end of term.
If you or your son have strenuous objections to SoCal I will be willing to talk to somebody who doesn't and is more like you than like the first guy.
My attempt at explaining Southern California to my son have resulted in him racing around our flat shrieking 'NO MORE RAIN!'