This post has the following content warnings:
the nature of the setting really changes the sort of person you're often representing
« Previous Post
+ Show First Post
Total: 99
Posts Per Page:
Permalink

 

He needs to ask the petitioner more questions, here. It's risky -- it could lose him the case, if she's unsympathetic enough -- but doing nothing could also lose him the case.

"Thea, do you think the world would have been better off if you had turned Martellus in for murder?"

Permalink

 

"I don't know. If he hadn't tried to kill me, then -- yes, almost certainly, it's like you just said -- he would have been executed -- but since he ended up dead anyway I'm less certain."

She hesitates. "I did think it would be better at the time. I don't know if that matters."

Permalink

"You're still asking easy questions that don't actually matter, just saying."

Permalink

"Hell agrees with that. The mere presence of a positive consequence relative to some alternative is not sufficient to make someone Good, otherwise Abadar would be a Good god just because trade often improves people's lives. Thea, can you tell us why you decided to spare Martellus?"

Permalink

"It might not make her Good, but it's a strong argument against that action making her Evil."

Permalink

"The question was directed at the petitioner, not at you."

Permalink

There are a lot of different ways she could truthfully answer this question and for some reason the truth effect isn't even allowing all of them.

"I was mostly thinking about the money issue -- our acting troupe was barely scraping by, and he was one of our star performers -- but it wasn't just that. We were on good terms, I didn't want him to die." She hesitates. "I did think this would leave both of us better off."

Permalink

 

"...Hell's position is that covering up the fact that your friend murdered someone so that you can profit financially is straightforwardly Evil."

Permalink

"Nirvana's position is that sparing someone's life while trying to ensure they cannot harm anyone else is Good, whether or not they're your friend and whether or not you benefit from it."

Permalink

"I don't really think it's evil to be kind of selfish if you're not making people worse off! But I also think it's kind of silly to say that's Good."

Permalink

"I feel like people have kind of forgotten about the crime boss thing? Can we talk about the crime boss thing at some point?"

Permalink

 

 

"I would prefer if this trial were more grounded in precedent from approximately everyone. Right now, I'm being presented with a lot of abstract arguments. I'm not saying those don't have a place in this courtroom, but I highly doubt anyone has anything novel to say about the proper role of mercy.

"...You can also talk about the crime boss thing, but it might be better to save that for after this point has been resolved."

Permalink

"I want to talk about it now because I think it makes my side look really good and everyone else look stupid."

Permalink

"Uh, no offense, but why did you just say that?"

Permalink

"I'm trying out a new strategy where I mostly say true things! I think everyone else here should consider it. By which I mean that I think it will hurt your arguments and help mine."

Permalink

 

 

 

Why is the Abyss like this. 

It's objectively unreasonable to be annoyed that they're trying out a strategy that doesn't just involve randomly making things up when it's convenient. He adds it to the long list of things he'll need to punish himself for after the trial.

Permalink

Regardless, if the judge wants precedent, he can provide it. However Nirvana trains their lawyers, they're too soft to threaten them with anything serious if they forget a citation, let alone discipline them for simply not having bothered to learn an obscure one. It's rare they have an answer for anything more than a few steps from the standard curriculum; that's not the only reason he can win impossible trials, but it's one of them.

There are judges who will discount non-standard precedent if you don't provide the court with a copy, but it's not particularly hard to predict what cases you're likely to need and bring those along. Besides, no one ever actually pauses a trial just to read an entire case; even if the interpretation is arguable, if you're lucky enough to get the sort of judge who particularly cares about miscellaneous rarely-cited cases they'll probably go along with your interpretation simply because you're the only one who has an interpretation. Heaven says it ought to be considered unLawful, sometimes, but it's not as if they're going to get Asmodeus kicked out of the Lawful alignment.

"Your Honor, to answer your question, there is substantial evidence of blackmail being Evil, even when the one being blackmailed would otherwise have faced a worse fate. In re Arlet, 4651, a woman discovers that her son is committing treason, blackmails him into paying her to hush it up, it ends up being fairly decisive in her being sentenced to Hell. In re Khonsu, 3841, the petitioner discovers that his employer killed someone, rather than turning him in he uses it to get special treatment at work, he was judged Neutral Evil though he ultimately chose Hell. In re Otoro, the petitioner had proof of an assassin's identity and kept it for blackmail rather than turning the assassin in, the issue was raised at his trial and he was sent to the Abyss--"

Permalink

"Nirvana disputes Hell's characterization of In re Otoro."

Permalink

"Nothing Hell said is technically speaking false, but if you'll direct your attention to the document Hell has just handed us, there were a number of other contributing factors to him being judged Evil, among them the fact that he had been the one to hire the assassin."

Permalink

"The blackmail was also cited among the reasons for the judgment."

Permalink

"Even completely discounting every other reason he was judged Evil, the case is still not analogous, because unlike the petitioner in this case, Otoro had no intention of preventing the assassin from continuing to kill people! There is a substantial difference between mercifully granting someone another chance after the biggest mistake of their life, and letting an assassin continue to assassinate people."

Permalink

"It is not as if the petitioner in this case was particularly successful at preventing the man she blackmailed from trying to kill anyone else. Furthermore, even if this case is determined to be completely irrelevant, that still leaves the other cases I mentioned."

Permalink

"I don't know if there are similar issues with the other cases you cited but under the circumstances I'd rather not take your interpretation as stated." He starts making a pointed show of reading through one of them.

Total: 99
Posts Per Page: