Accept our Terms of Service
Our Terms of Service have recently changed! Please read and agree to the Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy
posted on The Internet
Next Post »
« Previous Post
Permalink

Many countries in the global north have greatly relaxed immigration standards for espers compared to the general population, typically coupled with expedited immigration visas. In some cases, these are supplemented with other incentives to immigrate, such as start-up grants for esper immigrants, subsidized language tutoring, or relocation assistance. No matter how hostile a country usually is to immigrants from the global south, or how unwilling it is to accept refugees, most countries have noticed the obvious benefits of smoothing the path for espers.

At first glance, this sounds great — it's good for the espers, and in the short term it's good for the countries receiving the esper immigrants.

What it's not good for is the countries losing espers.

Every esper that moves to the United States (or Japan, or Spain, or...) to fight dungeons is one fewer esper fighting dungeons in the country they immigrated from. And, frankly, their country of origin probably needs it more. Sure, for the really big-deal dungeons espers will sometimes be brought in from all over (though even then, those dungeons don't necessarily get the same attention they'd have received if they were hitting a country in the global north — at Infested Wasteland's appearance in Casablanca, foreign espers were brought in for search and rescue, but no one bothered to actually arrange a team to kill it until it struck Toronto). But for your run-of the mill dungeon full of fist-sized leeches or wicker baskets full of victims hanging from the ceiling? Sure, either way it'll usually be cleared, but on basically every metric, from the average time for each victim to be rescued to the fraction of dungeons that outright escape, outcomes in the global north are better. Not all of that is because of esper brain drain — the disparities in the resources available to unempowered responders are surely also a contributing factor — but that doesn't mean espers leaving isn't significant.

The victims in those dungeons don't matter any less just because they happened to be born in Honduras or Cambodia or Benin, and unlike espers, they can't necessarily just pack up and move. I'd love it if countries in the global north were more willing to accept refugees from countries that are struggling with dungeons; if they end up with extra espers that way, I have no complaints. But with a handful of exceptions, countries in the global north are perfectly happy to take espers and their families, and leave everyone else behind.

And in the long term, greasing the wheels for espers to immigrate leaves everyone worse off, even people in the global north. Dungeons that escape from the global south might appear anywhere in the world, so diverting espers to countries that basically have their dungeon problems handled means those countries will likely end up targeted by worse dungeons than if they'd been less aggressive about trying to get their hands on as many espers as possible.

Let's stop prioritizing lives in the global north today over lives of everyone tomorrow, and put an end to special immigration treatment for espers.


Comments are currently open. The comments policy can be found here.

Total: 2
Posts Per Page:
Permalink

With lots of confusing, frustrating, stupid, or unfair things in international relations and markets, I like to consider game theory. Almost everything can be thought of as a prisoner's dilemma.

From the selfish, immediate perspective of individual countries, it is good to have more espers, and the bad long-term effects on the world at large from accepting esper immigrants from somewhere poor are difficult to see, small, or far in the future.

Asking countries to change a policy to benefit the world at large seems... Difficult. Asking countries to change a policy to benefit themselves by helping the whole world by getting everyone to not defect in a prisoner's dilemma... Also difficult. Especially when there are very easy and sympathetic arguments for special immigration treatment for espers and, I would think, the incentives for the espers themselves also often point towards immigration.

(Am a cynical realpolitik believer who knows NOTHING ACTUALLY, sue me)

Permalink

The idea only works if espers in third-world countries actually survive.  Combat espers have a significantly higher death rate in third-world countries than they do in the first world.  If third-world countries want to keep their espers, they need to do something about the mortality rate.

Also it'd be fucked up to make emigration illegal, which is the logical conclusion to this take.

This Thread Is On Hiatus
Total: 2
Posts Per Page: