"You're on the right track. Remember some things I told you earlier, about tiny spirals inside people; remember that those hidden orders are real and not just stories, or at least they were definitely real in dath ilan, and probably also here given that the food hasn't already killed me. Inside every human body, there are tiny spirals that code how a body works, themselves divided into twenty-three pairs of packages. One of those package-pairs is the sex package-pair, or chromosome pair in Baseline..."
Keltham sketches out the sex chromosomes, XY for male, XX for female. A child gets one chromosome in each chromosome-pair from each parent, allocated by the parent at random.
"But if you imagine a new genetic-alternative, mutation, which influenced the ratio of sperm containing Y chromosomes or X chromosomes - or a mutation in the mother, which influenced whether male or female pre-infants were kept and gestated - that mutation wouldn't have to be a mutation in the sex chromosomes in particular. A man could have sons that were more likely, though not certain, to have more other sons, and even the daughters of those men might still have male children of their own that had more sons. The force of possible heritable mutations that would throw a different mix is the pressure that only ever reaches a balancing point at one-to-one males to females."
"Or rather, to be precise, the balance is one-to-one parental investment in males and females. If females were half the size of men and required half as much parental attention and grew two to a birth, so that you could raise two females at the same cost as one male, the balancing point would be two women per men; you wouldn't be able to do better by birthing more men because men would be more expensive. If you see an animal species that isn't half male and half female, the first thing to ask is whether the males or females are bigger or smaller or fewer survive to adulthood or there's otherwise some big difference in how expensive they are to birth and raise to maturity."
"But there's a larger point and a more important one. The balancing point isn't the point that's good for the species, the country, as a whole. It's not the point you would pick if you were a supergod making the species from scratch. If you were doing that as a supergod, you'd probably have ten times as many women as men, and then just make it incredibly biologically difficult to ever birth all men - try to design the people so that no mutation could possibly affect the balance of ten women per men. More members of the species would be able to birth children. Or to look at it from another angle, you might also wonder whether a group or small faction birthing mostly women, would have an advantage over a group with half men and half women - if the mostly-female group could grow faster, because more of its members could bear children, or because it didn't have to pay the extra cost in food of supporting men too. But then a group like that would also be vulnerable to an invading mutation that birthed more men; that mutation would rapidly spread within the group. You can look at the sex ratio in humans, half men and half women, and say things like, 'Oh, I see that the balancing points between competing genes do not settle at the place that is good for groups having more children, it settles in the places that are advantageous for individuals having more children.'"
"And then everything else you see inside a human should settle in a similar kind of place, or it won't be stable against the pressure from mutated alternatives. That's why you want to prosper for yourself, instead of being full of unselfish desire to see your whole country prosper. It's why I need to offer you money to work for me, instead of you just working for the benefit of Golarion or Cheliax. A faction full of individuals all working for the common good would grow faster, obtain more resources and have more kids, and you might think a mutation which built people like that would soon take over the world. But as soon as that faction was invaded by a mutation in an individual that worked for their own benefit, that mutation would soon become more common; it wouldn't be a stable balancing point in the sort of species that ends up with half males and half females. Insect species, like ants if you have those here, which you probably do if there's a word for ants, have lots of worker ants all laboring for the benefit of an ant hive; they don't have equal investment in males and females. Ants can be balanced in different places because ants reproduce differently and workers share more genes with their queens."
"I wouldn't be surprised if the event that you remember historically as humans gaining free will, was the gods trying to modify people to work unselfishly for gods or maybe the gods' factions, like ants; but over time mutations accumulated in the human population that made them resistant to that magical template, and restored the old balancing points, where people cared about themselves instead. Or maybe the gods stopped doing it for some other reason, I don't know, I'm new around here. Oh, and I should say, the balancing points aren't purely selfish. You share half your genes with your parents, half your genes with your children, and an average of around half your genes with your brothers and sisters; you have some instinct to help them, though not quite as strongly as you wish to help yourself. My point is that, if you know how all the pieces of reality are woven together, if you know the hidden orders and secret stories behind them, you can take one glance at the statistics of women giving birth, see that it's half male children and half female children, and guess, 'I bet the people in this species mostly want pay for their work, and don't mostly work unselfishly for the good of the group like ants; I bet they care a lot about their brothers and sisters, but not nearly so much about their second cousins. The pressures-on-heredity in this species must balance at the point where individuals and small families can't easily get more grandchildren with a different strategy, not at the point where larger groups can't get more grandchildren with a different strategy.' And I could similarly guess very quickly that you hadn't been put together from scratch by gods or supergods, just from the way you acted so similar to dath ilani at a basic level, because gods wouldn't be bound by those balancing points the same way."
"I should probably pause here and check whether you have any questions, whether you followed all that, and whether I'm currently committing any visible horrible teaching errors that make a Chelish student's life less pleasant."