“Allow me a moment to consider.”
Elizeu doesn’t actually currently read lawful. (Possibly he’s been a bit too loose with agreements or bent too many ignorantly fashioned mundane laws… but he suspect the real reason is that Pharasma’s definition of lawfulness isn’t in alignment with the natural principles he adheres to.). But he does deeply respect consensually made agreements and makes his oaths carefully.
“I would ask for an exception in the unlikely event I come across or develop the spell through completely unrelated channels. Inventing a similar spell similar to Eriape’s spell wouldn’t count as “unrelated” unless I outright completely erased my memory of Eriape’s spell and developed through some other channel of inspiration. If I eventually make Druid acquaintances and acquire the Druid spell myself that might be sufficient inspiration.”
He raises a hand to indicate he is thinking more.
“And dire badgers, or other variants of badgers, like, I don’t know, I assume there are underdark badgers, all count as badgers right?”
Of course his main application will be indentured indebted servants employees. So he’ll need them to be capable of economically valuable production.
“And they’ll still count as badgers if I give them a few augmentations before reanimating and uplifting them, right? Like opposable thumbs? Have you ever wished for more dexterous thumbs?”
”And it’s admittedly unlikely to come up (my forays into spell invention have been mediocre at best, macabre at worst) but how exactly do derived spells interact with your request? Like if I invent a new spell for awakening statues based on Eriape’s spell, am I obligated to only use it on badger statues?”