This post has the following content warnings:
remedial goodness for Chelish archdukes
« Previous Post
+ Show First Post
Total: 88
Posts Per Page:
Permalink

"One feature of the law in Lastwall is that crimes are generally treated the same regardless of the relative social standing of the killer and their victim, and the exceptions are in the direction of - crimes are a more serious matter, and punished more harshly, if committed by a person in a position of power and trust against those they have power over."

Permalink

He's going to need to take half a moment to get his head around something about that. "What do you mean by a position of trust?"

Permalink

"An officer in the military. A magistrate. An investigator. A priest or anyone authorized to speak and act for the church. People where - when they commit a crime, not only does it have whatever direct harm it has, it also undermines public confidence that the people in that role are law-abiding, honorable and trustworthy, and who are in roles where that trust is important."

Permalink

"Ahh, so you punish representatives of the government more harshly." That makes some sense; if you appoint someone to do something, their superior is extending trust that they'll do what they were assigned to do, and failing at that could be worse than merely committing an ordinary crime. "Well, right now it's all murder, but the sentencing varies."

Permalink

"What sorts of things affect the sentencing?"

Permalink

"It's informed by what the sentence would have been before the queen abolished nearly all crimes. Status of the condemned, different for a slave or a serf or a free man or a lord. Sometimes status of the victim. Whether the crime was committed in a particularly heinous manner, or many crimes were committed together. In this case the official sentence was murder, but specifically the man was a slave who murdered his master and another member of his master's family, so he was crucified. I suppose the least serious case that might be technical murder is something like not accepting a duel refusal, or killing someone you have the authority to discipline, but we're mostly not executing people for those."

Permalink

 

 

"I see. You aren't executing people for those because...they don't seem like a very serious problem, or they are so commonplace you'd end up executing too many people?"

Permalink

"Well, they weren't previously murder at all under most circumstances, but I don't know where else you'd put them in the new system. If it's a really botched duel I might put the man in the pit or the blood well."

Permalink

 

"The pit or the blood well?"

Permalink

"Pit has an animal in it. Blood well is a covered stone pit full of water. If you're still alive when we pull you out three days later, that's it."

Permalink

 

 

 


What??? Why????

Permalink

 

 

 


"For what sorts of things are people sentenced to, uh, fight animals, or tread water for three days?"

Permalink

"Well, you can do trial by ordeal for anything, if it's a serious crime. But it's mainly for any situation where you're tempted to say - well, maybe it deserves death, but we need this man for the defense of the realm. If it's true, let him prove it, instead of just letting him go. Or the other way around, where the thing wouldn't be a death offense for someone else, but there's some ambiguity about the status of the man who did it. Let him prove himself, too, if there's call.

The Asmodeans didn't love it, either, but it's older than they are." 

And it's not that different from the justification for the dies ira, but he's not really planning to share his arguments for how traditional ordeals are compatible with Asmodean theology.

Total: 88
Posts Per Page: