There's an amphitheater, a place where a hundred of the stone walkways twine around to create space for a hundred thousand people to sit in close proximity, and someone is giving a lecture or a demonstration at the base of it, the seats closest to him filled with eager, tiny, bearded Dwarf-children.
And they spiral down, and down, and down, past waterfalls and egg-sized gemstones left half in the rock and halls of crystal. Everything grows gradually more ornate and more perfectly maintained and the clang of hammers fades behind them. "People say," her guide says, "that we only have a council instead of a single King because there were nine winners of the competition to design the throne so we couldn't just select one person to sit it." And they push open the doors to reveal, indeed, nine thrones so elaborate it would be hard to choose between them, and nine squat bearded people sitting them.
Unfortunately, politics is iterated. The best politician with a damning legacy can and will be outperformed by the mediocre one with no such handicap.
Outperformed at popularity contests? Sure. Sorry if that doesn't move me much. The fate of the world's rather at stake here.
I don't think you can. His style of leadership is entirely about evaluating which projects need to happen and who can make them happen, which he can do very quickly, attracting the most capable people to those projects, and pushing himself on whichever element would otherwise be the one delaying a plan in coming together. It would be a very very unusual political arrangement that gave him the latitude he needs without amounting to 'he's King, someone else does the administrative tasks and the public relations'.
He sounds more like a corporate leader than a political one, actually. Of the high-powered interstellar commerce type, not the Asgardian, but I've met the breed.
The distinction I'd draw is that a corporate officer fires people if they don't behave how he likes and a political leader has to tolerate them or punish them - the equivalent to firing is exile and that touches much more of a person's life even in the relevant sort of economy than what job they work. Not that being fired is not a punishment, especially with the kind of money people in the second tier of those companies can make, but it's not as - personal. I think I would very much like to set up your father as the executive of an galactic engineering concern, I think that would be great.
I wish we hadn't burned the ships. But it's easier to make calls like that in hindsight.
Tolerating has its drawbacks! I am not advocating universal toleration! I just think he'd work well in a setting where the sphere he controlled was more complete in precision and less so in life-consumingness.
Sure. And best in a setting with no Enemy and mining which didn't take years and thousands of people defending the site to get crappy metal. I'm not arguing that the current setting is the best one for my father's talents, I am saying that Kingship is a thing he's good at and entirely capable of being great at, and what you're calling 'corporate officer' might be the only way to win the war, so it is fortunate that he has the political power to pursue it.
When we got to Araman the Valar spoke the Doom, and things were very tense. Father kept saying he wanted to leave now and they kept saying not yet and Maitimo was keeping all of us on shore as proof that we weren't about to sail off without them but no one could agree on which mixture of the hosts to have on the boats and Artanis - and a bunch of other people, I don't mean to pick on her, but she was the most powerful and the most visible - was saying that they were crossing only to avenge the theft of the boats and see my father destroyed for it.
And then word got out that Nolofinwë'd formally started calling himself King of the Noldor. I thought Father'd be angry but he just said 'all right, we're leaving now.' And we got on and left.
My first reason would probably sound like 'even Artanis does not deserve to be trapped with the Valar indefinitely'.