theology is second nature to us history nerd paladins of Iomedae who spent fifteen years unable to wield a sword, so it's easy to forget that the average person only knows the approved theological takeaways from two or three of the Acts
Next Post »
« Previous Post
Permalink

Iustin mentioned in his interview that he did the sermons twice daily and thought he was doing a bad job of them, because he had no time to prepare them. So De Luna offered to take them over at least while he's here, not because he's any better suited to it - he gives sermons to the priests in training and in Vigil, which is a very different skillset - but because perhaps his errors will be in different directions and useful to Iustin. He has been to the best of his abilities sticking to the very basics, but it can be easy for someone who spends most of their free time getting into complicated theology debates to assume that an ignorant ordinary person is familiar with two or three of the basic philosophical distinctions the Acts emphasizes.

He's also trying not to be political, so he has avoided giving the sermons he'd very much like to on Iomedae's relationship to Taldor, or lately on censorship.

His Sunday sermon is a reading from a part of Acts that's always popular, the part where Iomedae holds a fortress against overwhelming odds with badly injured men until sunrise in the Second Battle of Encarthan, and then the most basic explanation of it he can possibly give: despair is a sin, and the root of many more dangerous sins, and even in the face of overwhelming odds one can and must choose to keep trying to do the best possible thing. But also, despair is usually an error: there are very few things that are as intractable as they look. A persistent theme in Acts is people telling Iomedae that there's no way to do the thing that needs doing, or no way to do it without great evils. No way to hold this fortress, no way to take that one, no way to conduct interrogations without torture, no way to keep discipline without brutality, no way to have soldiers without whores. Despair, all of it; false, all of it.

And then there are all of the necessary caveats: the fact there is some way to do better doesn't mean that any random way you thought of will be better, the fact that no position is hopeless does not mean it's not an important responsibility to get into the position from which winning is likeliest; that despair is a sin does not make optimism a virtue, because to willfully deceive yourself into thinking a situation better than it is is also foolish. Iomedae, speaking to the dying men, does not claim to them that they will not die; speaking to the living ones she does not claim to foresee a victory that she was at the time not sure of. She was instead steadfast in her conviction that they had a little more in them, a little more courage, a little more stubbornness, a little more hope, and that the dawn was after all approaching, and their fate still in their hands.

Total: 44
Posts Per Page:
Permalink

Oh they were kind of hoping for a denunciation of Valia Wain before her trial, or an explanation of whether slavery is in fact going to be abolished, or an explanation of whether it's true that Iomedae's trying to destroy them because they're Evil and unworthy.

Permalink

It’s a solid sermon.  He can see the immediate relevance to himself.  If he hadn’t despaired of ever getting out from his school debt, he wouldn’t have done his whole healing loan scheme thing (he is avoiding thinking of it in any detail).  Well… he still isn’t out from it, but he’s feeling optimistic he can find a way free, without absconding after a reincarnate doing anything Evil or Anarchic, NOT that he was planning anything like that (a detect thoughts would see him clumsily trying to avoid thinking of a plan involving reincarnate.).

Fernando isn’t even a little bit worried that Iomedae wants to destroy him!  He’s clearly one of the helpless despairing victims of the Asmodeans who is going to do much better now that healing is going to climb in price and he can eschew the Evil material components to heal he has hope.

Permalink

Did you know that some churches will just tell you what they think Good is, without you having to bother random clerics on the street?

despair is a sin

Despair is the loss of hope. Giving up on one approach and trying another, which can be rational; or giving up on life altogether, which might be fine if you like where you're going but not if your enemies are going to shackle your soul to an undead abomination. Pursuing the best available course becomes very hard if you don't expect to succeed, so you should cultivate hope.

Sin is something your god('s clerics) don't want you to do and will punish you for doing. (*) 

Iomedae is saying that, if her men don't do what's best for them anyway, they will not only fail but be additionally punished for the sin of... not trusting their commander's plans? That sounds like a Lawful thing, not a Good one!

A persistent theme in Acts is people telling Iomedae that there's no way to do the thing that needs doing, or no way to do it without great evils. No way to hold this fortress, no way to take that one, no way to conduct interrogations without torture, no way to keep discipline without brutality, no way to have soldiers without whores. Despair, all of it; false, all of it.

If your commander is Iomedae then she's always right, and her impossible-looking plans always work out, and so despair is wrong. You should trust Iomedae's plans more, she was always right even when she was mortal. Also, not trusting her is a sin and you'll punished for it.

Although, many of the actual examples do seem like Good ones? No torture, no brutality, no designated-rape-targets (**). So maybe the take-away is that - Iomedae is about Lawfully commanding people to be Good? 

Huh. That was surprisingly easy to understand! Well-written church sermons are great, she should hear more of those.

 

(*) Feather knows this word because she learned Chelish from Asmodean peasants.

(**) The Asmodean peasants didn't have any in their village and were probably upset about this.

Permalink

...but are they supposed to rise up and kill the old nobility, or are they supposed to definitely not rise up and kill the old nobility?

Permalink

Alexeara finds Chelam in the crowd and approaches Alexandre after the sermon is over.

"Duchess, this is Alexandre Riguez de Luna, a paladin of Iomedae and the scholar I mentioned to you last night. Ser de Luna, this is Carlota Guimar, the duchess of Chelam and one of the leading lights of the convention. She is hoping to reintroduce censorship to Westcrown, and was interested in examples of the more extreme edge of what's permitted in Lastwall."

Permalink

Oh praise Iomedae someone's working on that I've been tearing my hair out - you can't talk like that in Oppara. 

 

"Your grace. I'm honored. If I can be of any assistance in your work I would be delighted to do so. In my time here it has struck me that the present situation seems to poorly achieve the aim of peace and the rule of law in Cheliax, and it is a great reassurance to know that the Convention is at work addressing it."

Permalink

Oh, she wasn't aware the Iomedaens actually had anyone like this. How characteristic, really, to have them, probably have had them stationed in Ustalav wraith-slaying (she's guessing off his magic items) and send them here now

"It is our intent to introduce tomorrow, unless the vote for abolition occupies the whole plenary session, a ban on most publication of political, religious and social commentary unless someone is willing to be liable for any crimes that it incites, or unless it is permitted elsewhere. We are hoping that by permitting anything published in Lastwall, Molthune or Osirion - I'll entertain other places, too, if you want to make a case for them - we - avoid being excessively restrictive, and ensure that if there is a reasonable case for the value of a work and little reason to believe it will burn the city down then it will be available. 

Towards that end - I have vague familiarity with some theological texts that contain ideas elsewhere called radical, but that I note have never moved the people of Vellumis to a riot, nor have they been enormously incendiary reprinted elsewhere. My theory of why is frankly that the sort of man who is stirred to murder by his reading is not very clever, and so any reading that requires cleverness is effectively sufficient to avoid moving him. I wanted to, in my presentation of the proposed censorship laws, have some examples to hand. More for Cotonnet's benefit than that of the floor, really, I think the convention is close to united in thinking we need more censorship and I am half endeavoring to get out ahead of the predictable movement to just ban it all."

Permalink

De Luna doubts this will appease Cotonnet in the slightest, because the thing the man believes in most fundamentally is not in fact 'well-reasoned arguments for a wide range of ideas ought to be available for sensible people to discuss' but that the typical person's pursuit through free means of information will have good results. It is an appealing philosophy that is as far as he can tell completely false and 'the free exchange of ideas will still remain for everyone who doesn't have the attention span of a lantern archon and the impulse control of a dretch' is not responsive to it. 

 

Nonetheless it's a book recommendation question! He likes those. "Of course, your grace. Lastwall indeed mostly reviews books for publication with the question in mind of whether they will mislead their readers rather than whether the claim they explore is - an awkward one, and I have personally approved for publication texts that would have quite dramatic effects on the world if widely heeded and put into practice. But I hesitate, in this particular moment, with the trial of an Iomedaen Select for incitement to murder and - I hope it's not outrageous to say - implicitly in part for defiance of the Crown - anticipated this afternoon, with any texts that might confirm in the mind of your audience that we are a radically minded faith, as we really are not."

Permalink

"Indeed, the argument I would like to make is that radicalism is not understood as a product of believing particular arguments but as behaving in a particular manner in response to believing them, but I agree that people will be - sensitive right now to the suggestion that the Church is anti-monarchist, or anti-imperial. But surely you have approved some texts which are not the Church's teachings but merely permissible dissent from them."

Permalink

It takes embarrassingly long to think of anything. Most people inclined to dissent from Church teachings do not have the temperament to write a long and careful explanation of their reasoning. "...there are some good texts, your grace, critiquing Lastwall's neutrality in the Chelish Civil War and condemning the ongoing decision not to declare war against the Thrune regime?"

Permalink

" - yes, that'd be perfect. Thank you."

Permalink

"I am honored to have the opportunity to be of assistance in this. Witnessing the present situation in Westcrown has been - like watching a city full of smouldering piles of coals, petitioning the government for leave to pour some water on them, and being repeatedly told that naturally if any buildings catch fire that will be entirely illegal."

Permalink

" - I cannot agree more. May I quote you on that, in the floor debate."

Permalink

Ah ugh he knew he shouldn't have said things. "I did not speak in confidence, your grace, and have no claim on the words I've spoken to you, but it would grieve me to have further injured relations between the Church and Her Majesty's government, and grieve me more to be misunderstood as making any comment on the justice to be done today."

Permalink

 

"The Lord Marshal pled with me, eventually, to speak to him plainly, and I dearly desire that no misunderstanding arises because you imagine you lack the same license. If you'd rather I not say it I won't. I am not trying to worsen the catastrophic situation in the assembly or in the city around understanding of the Church of Iomedae, much less to damage relations between Church and Crown, both of which I consider myself to serve. I think the censorship law will help, because people will stop flinging false claims the Church of Iomedae says various things at one another to win unrelated debates, and it'll be clear which publishing houses you need a representative at to prevent nonsense. 

The liberal nobility came to this convention intending, for the most part, to steer a path between the desires of the Church and the Crown, satisfy both, and set Cheliax on a path to be safe, orderly, and paying as little as possible for its safety and order. But the Crown has as a principled matter refused to indicate to us what she'd see us do, and the Church has I think not out of principle but out of incompetence done the same thing. You have allies here. Tell us what you need."

Permalink

"- have you said this to the Lord Marshal, your grace?"

Permalink

"Yes! ...possibly not bluntly enough. Is it your recommendation that I try saying it to him more and more bluntly until he looks enlightened."

Permalink

"In my own work I have often found it helpful, your grace."

Permalink

"All right. I will attempt that. I probably cannot obtain the books themselves by tomorrow, but if you have specific recommendations for me -"

Permalink

Sure, he can write down specific books excoriating Lastwall for its handling of the Chelish Civil War.

Permalink

Has the Lord Marshal raced off to one of his urgent duties already or is he around to be cornered and previous interactions repeated more bluntly until he looks enlightened?

Permalink

He's around. Trying to have slightly fewer urgent duties.

Permalink

"Lord Marshal. Thank you for the introduction, it was very helpful. I repeated to your colleague some complaints I understand myself already to have made to you and he suggested I say them again to you more bluntly; may I?"

Permalink

"Please do."

Permalink

"The liberal nobility came to this convention with the intent of writing some kind of practical and high-minded compromise between what the Church and the Crown were looking for here. The Queen is abstaining from dropping any hints about what she wants from us. The Church is...also not dropping any hints about what it wants from us, and is frankly treating us neither as resources nor as negotiating partners. During the debate over Molthune I was at work trying to draft a proposal to have Cheliax consult Iomedae and have Her leave for every war she ever fights, because that was what my guess about what you were aiming for, but I would not need to guess if you would tell me, and the proposals would be written in advance."

Total: 44
Posts Per Page: