"Right. So I've written a couple hundred of these, a couple dozen really big ones on really important catastrophic mistakes. Most people haven't done as many but I had fifteen years with nothing better to do. If a prisoner dies in custody in Vellumis I write it up and when Cyprian declared himself Emperor I wrote that one too. - that's why I'm here, actually. You start with the interviews. I know it seems like we're - picking around things that aren't all that important. But the problem is that the mind can't keep five different stories alive at once, it picks one and then starts getting all its soldiers to dig in around that one. So we do the interviews first, even if we are ignoring very big obvious things that need recommending, to try to get down as much of the situation on the ground as it was when we started poking it as we can. It's not instead of talking about what we did wrong, it's - so that there's some record to refer to when we're talking about that. After the interviews, I build a timeline. I like to do it all visually, take over a couple of tables, flag every point where anyone made a decision, or could have, that would have prevented this. Three months ago a letter sent out to Valia Wain sounded like marching orders, that'll be on there. Around the same time no one asked 'should we hire a staff for the delegates?' That'll be on there. They probably failed to think about that because Iustin's inexperienced for his command and sleeping about six hours a night and working every waking moment outside his required break times, that'll definitely be on there. But the interviews are first, because there are probably thirty, forty things like that, and if we start by listing all the ones we can think of we'll miss more than half and then not really go back to them later. It's human nature. ...everyone else's nature too, as far as I've noticed.
Then from the timeline, you look at all the decisions that would have prevented this and - some aren't worth it. Maybe you could have prevented this by not letting people hold political debates, but that's not worth it, skip that one. Maybe we could have prevented it by funding all temples 30% more, but we don't have the funds, skip that one. And you figure out which decisions would have prevented it and also been a good idea, and that's your first draft. We write the core thing, but everyone with an interest writes their own takes on it, as a supplemental, and it all gets submitted together. There might be a few things in there which can't be distributed outside the Church - if an interviewee tells us something in confidence, if it's got guard schedules in it - but there's always a public version, and it'd make me downright proud if you took a look.
Is that helpful?"