[Hey. I'm sorry I made you think about things you didn't want to think about the other day.]
[I don't really know how to get more specific,] he says. [Like. Don't joke about my personal trauma? Is that specific enough?]
[I wasn't setting out to do that, though. As far as I knew, no science was involved in your personal trauma.]
[Yeah, and not a lot of literal holding down, either. It was still a nasty reminder.]
[And I'm sorry. But I don't know how to avoid more stuff like that unless you tell me. I guess I could just not talk directly to you?]
+She said she's going to go through me if she has messages, even if they're mostly for you, 'cause she upset you the other day.+
+Yeah. She apologized and stuff, but we couldn't figure out how she could avoid doing it again.+
+Well, to be fair, we aren't sure that I'm not going to deeply upset you at some point.+
+...I'm confused about where the fairness comes in here,+ he says after a moment.
+...Mostly just an expression, in retrospect it doesn't make a lot of sense. There's no strong reason you and Jane have to talk, so if you don't want to risk it you don't have to.+
+Yeah. I mean, I dunno, if she seemed like she got what was wrong with the thing she actually said... but she didn't, and I couldn't explain it to her.+
+I had the impression that she got what happened when she said it, but not why it happened.+
+I don't think I can explain it to Jane. I have, like, a vague outline, and I model you as being generally skittish so I'd steer clear of pretty much any levity around the subject of you and hurting, but I don't think Jane distinguishes cleanly between levity and not-levity - I mean, she could probably imitate someone who happens to not be funny, she has enough sample material, but that wouldn't be talking to Jane, I could imagine she'd rather just skip it.+