"Then yes, if there's a direct correlation of frequency to crystalpower we'll want - hmm, probably actually nuclear fission generators because, well, first, fusion's a pain in the ass to make happen, and second, I don't even remember the emission spectrum of deuterium-tritium fusion if I ever even knew, but I know Cherenkov radiation's way up there, or possibly matter-antimatter...
"Both of those are incredibly dangerous, mind you, especially if mishandled, but they're still pretty simple. Matter-antimatter reactions just make radiation, clean and simple, extremely high-energy gamma rays; it's probably actually safest, despite it all, because you can precisely control how much happens when, and if you do it inside a power-crystal, it'll...hopefully not even ever affect the outside, depending upon the way absorption actually works, whereas with nuclear fission generators...it's literally unpredictable when a specific particle will stop holding together and do the thing that gives the generator its name, even if you can make models in aggregate, such as determining unstable elements' half-lives. And nuclear fission reactors can violently explode, leaving significant regions uninhabitable for quite a long while because of the resulting contamination, not just from the blast but also the secondary radioactivity.
"...I'm not even going to think about the sometimes-hypothesized proton decay right now. That's some umpty-billion years off at worst, and at best actually never; it can wait."
"Of course all of this goes out the window if I find out that crystals give no fucks about creating charged vs. not-charged batteries. They do weigh the same, after all."