When last he left the History of Eco Studies the field was dominated by the sages.
Their mix of theoretical and practical approaches supposedly became a problem when Gol Acheron and his sister began studying dark eco. There's a brief digression about how reliable various aspects of the various stories about them are, and what it would say about the societies that invented them if they were invented. One version of the story is even reproduced in full in the book: their exposure to dark eco drove them mad and led them to want to team up with the lurkers for world domination, only for them to be driven even madder and seek to betray the lurkers and destroy the entire planet; then someone from one of the villages they raided got mad, broke into their citadel, prayed for a miracle, received light eco from the heavens, and destroyed the dark sages.
Regardless, it is clear that treating dark eco as something to be studied, understood, and used represents a major change in the field. These days people take precautions to limit their exposure and don't try to destroy the world.
Recently, the attitude that eco is something sacred has been fading. Simultaneously, advances in statistics have led to changes in the way experimental results are reported. Consequently, modern and historical writing on the topic sound very different: the field has gone from discussing how red eco embodies the virtue of steadfastness to running controlled trials of people's running speed and grip strength with and without red eco exposure.
There's an entire chapter on the history of eco containment, and the weaknesses of older materials, and what new experiments have been made possible (for example, injecting eco into people is now technically feasible).