"Seems simple enough."

They go see what's playing in the theater.

Their options are:

a drama/romance starring a kid from a poor, recently colonized world trying to prove herself and an embittered, newly single heiress with a secret that could destroy her family

a sports drama about some zero-gravity basketballish game and a team of underdogs preparing for the championship

a romantic comedy about coworkers at a luxury resort 

a murder mystery also set at a luxury resort, starring a bunch of people whose names are in VERY BIG TEXT

a historical drama set four hundred years ago on a then-newly-annexed planet

a romantic comedy about outrageously rich people who need to get married to meet the conditions of their inheritance

a kid's movie in which household appliances are all people conspiring to help a kid whose parents turn into green spiky monsters at night

...let's go with the first one. "Can you comment on inaccuracies as we go?" she asks the tablet.

"In romantic movies people typically behave in ways that would in the real world be a strong indication you shouldn't romance them," says the tablet. 

"I meant more like noting oversimplifications about the planets or cultural facts in play."

"I can try that."

"Thanks."

They go sit down for the movie. Isabella gets an aisle seat so only one of her wings has to scrunch oddly in the seat not meant for her.

The protagonists are very pretty and have obvious chemistry and spend most of the movie quietly resenting and misunderstanding and manipulating each other while having a lot of sex and eventually they figure things out and tearfully apologize and have better sex. Her tablet is happy to provide bits of historical context - when that planet was colonized, who chose to live there, how unusual it is for kids from those populations to earn those aptitude scores.

"Do scores vary a lot between populations?" she types.

"Yes. There are likely some genetic differences in aptitudes, and there are also differences in schooling, encouragement, the extent to which the scores are considered a priority..."

She doesn't say 'hmm' out loud because she is in a movie theater.

When the movie's over they go back to their room and Isabella asks for an introduction to the laws of the Radch plus any applicable local ordinances.

The Radch has all of the normal laws you might expect against assault and theft and tax evasion and murder and rape and so on. It has much-stricter-than-American laws against covering up violations of other laws or enabling people to commit crimes or evade surveillance. It prohibits some drugs she hasn't heard of. It strictly prohibits interfering with military operations or filming them if you happen to see them or sharing information about them which you were not authorized to have or share. To the extent that the Radch suppresses speech, which might be an impression one would get, it does not seem to do that by directly prohibiting any speech except the transmission of classified and dangerous information and incitement to commit crimes.

That was an impression one had, yes. How can one identify a military operation? What constitutes incitement, what constitutes dangerous information? What counts as a coverup or enabling of crime?

'dangerous information' is the catchall for instructions on how to build, how to conceal, or where to find weapons of mass destruction, or how to circumvent security measures intended to prevent their construction and release. 

Soldiers are always in uniform; if there's no one in uniform it's not a military operation unless someone shows you a badge and says it's an undercover military operation, in which case you can contact this department to verify that. 

Incitement to commit a crime is speech that tells specific people to commit a specific crime; 'crime is good!' does not count, nor does 'Berry, go do a crime!' but 'Berry, go rob a store' does. 

Covering up a crime: destroying evidence, knowingly hiding a fugitive, lying to investigators, failing to report a crime that you witnessed

enabling a crime: giving advice on how to avoid detection for a crime, advising someone of circumstances that would make it easy for them to commit a crime, when a reasonable person would conclude that your intent was that they'd go commit the crime and when they in fact went and did that; knowingly supplying someone with resources they needed to commit a crime; assuring someone of your intent to assist them in covering up a crime, even if you don't in fact assist them in covering up the crime.

Hm. Any oddball object-level crimes? Is suicide illegal? What's the state of immigration law? What are the penalties for all these crimes?

Suicide is legal. If you're underage there's a waiting period. Humans can immigrate. There are a couple laws about importing various plant and animal products that seem oddly specific. Touching people's skin with your bare hand is prosecuted as sexual assault.

The penalty for most crimes is re-education.

It is time for Isabella to learn everything there is to know about THAT now.

Details are not all public but it seems to work by instilling a strong aversion to the behavior that got you in trouble. Aversions to getting angry, or to holding a knife, or to drinking, are common. People who have sex with children usually get handed an intense aversion to both sex and children, which some people on the internet feel is excessive (though the majority opinion is that they have it coming). If she reads about it for a while she'll definitely find mentions of people with aversions to discussing politics or to spending money or to going out in public. This is generally considered a bad outcome, it's supposed to be more targeted than that.

"What's eating you?"

She turns the tablet in his direction.

"...yep that looks pretty bellanivorous there."

"I think the 'ni' part is just part of some of the prefixes, not the suffix."

"Okay, so, do we bail?"

"We - research bailing options. I don't think there's anything that will trip us up if we hang out talking to the tablet and sometimes watch movies, it's not an imminent hazard."