Edit History (Oldest to Newest)
Version: 1
Fields Changed (Original)
Updated
Content
For those who are among us, and those are still far away
Just because you are not a part of things doesn't mean they can't affect you.

Emmet Sophian from Andoran, representing the (in his words) closest thing to the fortunately non-existent church of Gruhastha in Avistan, unfortunately cannot come to the Convention as a delegate, not being Chelish by any of the relevant definitions.
He still sends his best wishes, blessings from Gruhastha and several other obscure deities he knows of, and several dozen pages of suggestions for approaches to defining laws in a Reasonable and Wise way, many mirroring ideas from the Galtan revolutions, many completely opposed to them.
One such suggestion is "it is bad for society to have titles and forms of address people must use, or any other type of etiquette. Those are expressions of the desire to dominate others, for no gain other than proof of their power and position. It is purely harmful without any redeeming qualities, especially in society shaped by Asmodeanism. And requiring a salvation from Asmodean worldviews and practices". Another example is some thoughts on opposition to the concept of inheritance and of family.
Most of the suggestions end with "here are all the reasons why this is probably impossible and/or pointless to implement, but an important thing to consider nonetheless". He doesn't expect them to actually end up useful, but that is no reason to not try.

Version: 2
Fields Changed Status
Updated
Version: 3
Fields Changed Subject
Updated
Content
For those who are among us, and those who are still far away
Just because you are not a part of things doesn't mean they can't affect you.

Emmet Sophian from Andoran, representing the (in his words) closest thing to the fortunately non-existent church of Gruhastha in Avistan, unfortunately cannot come to the Convention as a delegate, not being Chelish by any of the relevant definitions.
He still sends his best wishes, blessings from Gruhastha and several other obscure deities he knows of, and several dozen pages of suggestions for approaches to defining laws in a Reasonable and Wise way, many mirroring ideas from the Galtan revolutions, many completely opposed to them.
One such suggestion is "it is bad for society to have titles and forms of address people must use, or any other type of etiquette. Those are expressions of the desire to dominate others, for no gain other than proof of their power and position. It is purely harmful without any redeeming qualities, especially in society shaped by Asmodeanism. And requiring a salvation from Asmodean worldviews and practices". Another example is some thoughts on opposition to the concept of inheritance and of family.
Most of the suggestions end with "here are all the reasons why this is probably impossible and/or pointless to implement, but an important thing to consider nonetheless". He doesn't expect them to actually end up useful, but that is no reason to not try.

Version: 4
Fields Changed Content, board, section
Updated
Continuity Changed from Sandboxes to The Chelish Constitutional Convention
Content
For those who are among us, and those who are still far away
Just because you are not a part of things doesn't mean they can't affect you.

Emmet Sophian from Andoran, representing the (in his words) closest thing to the fortunately non-existent church of Gruhastha in Avistan, unfortunately cannot come to the Convention as a delegate, not being Chelish by any of the relevant definitions.
He still sends his best wishes, blessings from Gruhastha and several other obscure deities he knows of, and several dozen pages of suggestions for approaches to defining laws in a Reasonable and Wise way, many mirroring ideas from the Galtan revolutions, many completely opposed to them.
One such suggestion is "it is bad for society to have titles and forms of address people must use, or any other type of etiquette. Those are expressions of the desire to dominate others, for no gain other than proof of their power and position. It is purely harmful without any redeeming qualities, especially in society shaped by Asmodeanism. And requiring a salvation from Asmodean worldviews and practices". Another example is some thoughts on opposition to the concept of inheritance and of family.
Most of the suggestions end with "here are all the reasons why this is probably impossible and/or pointless to implement, but an important thing to consider nonetheless". He doesn't expect them to actually end up useful, but that is no reason to not try.