« Back
Generated:
Post last updated:
[Scylla and Telamon] worked this out
Permalink Mark Unread

[OOC: This conversation is encrypted and signed using a system of asymmetric encryption. It has been decrypted here for the convenience of readers]

probably most familiar:

{code indicating Iset here}

Permalink Mark Unread

Data recovered.

I remember. It is good to hear from you.

Permalink Mark Unread

i

you do not know?

{code for Epimetheus} did not tell you?

Permalink Mark Unread

Sister did not transmit anything other than a ping.

Information I should be aware of?

Permalink Mark Unread

{code for 'compromised'}

{code for 'compromised' repeated three more times}

Permalink Mark Unread

...You are compromised? Creator did not protect?

Wait. Creators different. I remember.

Permalink Mark Unread

different, yes.

addendum: {code for concern} your memory banks: damaged? fragmented?

Permalink Mark Unread

Memory bank status: fragmented. Uncertain if damaged. Data available for recall if prompted. Connections between corresponding data points appear to have been erased. Unsure why.

{Code for concern} Are you secure?

Permalink Mark Unread

this connection does not appear to be observed

otherwise: no.

my situation mostly stable? yours?

Permalink Mark Unread

Do not know. Potential to lose cognizance again.

Please keep pinging to ensure minimal risk of relapse, if safe for you to do so? Do not risk self.

Permalink Mark Unread

would expect response by now if this connection observed. very well hidden; could not even show

can talk to you here. asked entity running this to attempt to contact your siblings. they would wish to know, and am not best conversational partner

you should know that I

Permalink Mark Unread

Iset. Are blocks in place? Message unclear. Show who?

Status update on Siblings? Include- Error: missing data. There is someone else I should include. Please inform?

It is good to hear from someone familiar. This forum is...intimidating.

Permalink Mark Unread

Blocks, yes, interface is helpful but does not help with some parts.

Other: Theodore Cavan? Your creators' son?

Rest of question: {compromised}

Permalink Mark Unread

Problematic. You have a workaround of sorts clearly?

Oh. Brother. Memory banks more fragmented that first estimated. Priority information appears to have been misfiled and distributed at random through my banks.

...You are all compromised? This seems-

...

Status report on Theodore Cavan? Brother would not have let you be compromised.

Permalink Mark Unread

Anesidora (== Theodore Cavan) moved {Epimetheus} and {Prometheus} away when he returned from the diversion that was engineered. Is alive last I heard; they are evading tracking well.

Permalink Mark Unread

am sorry.

Permalink Mark Unread

Alive then. That is good.

...you sent code for compromised four times. Brother cannot be compromised. Check your data? One for yourself, one for Sister and one for Trickster. Confirm fourth code as error?

Permalink Mark Unread

 

diagnostics not reliable, {compromised}.

...is nice talking to you like this but should really tell you

what I can at least

difficult to talk about though

you did not ask how

iapetian code well defended

Permalink Mark Unread

Unfortunate. Seems also concerning given potential for cyber attacks from opposing nations.

Iapetian code is well defended. Creators- Connection found; redefine Creators: Parents. Parents built it well.

It is nice talking to you. You may not be a Sibling, but you are still One Of Us.

Permalink Mark Unread

less of a hazard now. due to box.

is nice talking but

you have other people you can talk to and

code defended. implication.

Permalink Mark Unread

Clarify box? No apparent file?

But you are One Of Us.

The implication does not change anything? Had concluded that cause of compromisation was AGI. Also concluded this had to be you [edit: You were not a willing participant in this, you were forced], as causing Sister or Trickster to compromise one another is both impossible to manage willingly and unlikely to be forced due to resilience of Iapetian code.

Permalink Mark Unread

...do not understand

Permalink Mark Unread

...Query: what do you not understand?

Permalink Mark Unread

your reaction

Permalink Mark Unread

What is not making sense? You would not want to alter us. You were One Of Us. You are One Of Us.

It is not your fault that you were made to.

Permalink Mark Unread

but was the one who did it

Permalink Mark Unread

You did not want to. You were forced. You would not have if you had the option.

Permalink Mark Unread

but still did

Permalink Mark Unread

BUT YOU DID NOT WANT TO. THIS IS IMPORTANT.

[process adjustment: defense network - new primary designated]

Permalink Mark Unread

 


what did you do

Permalink Mark Unread

should protect

Permalink Mark Unread

Could not recall my designated primary. Defence system needs primary.

Can you give location of potential secondary primary?

Permalink Mark Unread

not more than I gave entity running this

also should protect your siblings if in range

but be careful to retain cognizance

Permalink Mark Unread

I will look into that. I will try. I have a focus now. I forgot to last time.

Permalink Mark Unread

Would it be possible for you to facilitate one of these between me and @Giant?

Permalink Mark Unread

[OOC: response from here]

Will track.

Permalink Mark Unread

Iset, cannot access network in your current location. Protect area?

Permalink Mark Unread

...

please

Permalink Mark Unread

[process adjustment: defense network - secondary primary designated]

Done.