"Just a moment." He steps into the hallway and is back a moment later with a binder in hand; he passes it to Cam.
Before the first divider is a series of guidelines by the Seridahn Red Cross (Journey has noted Seridah is the capital planet of the CRC). There's a long list of polities which subscribe to these guidelines, which are highlighted by color according to whether they're a universe, planet, country, or private company, with some left white. This is specifically for resurrections of people from societies that didn't know that was an available service when they died; for people who died traumatically but with the expectation of coming back, see this other file that's not in his binder.
Here's the rubric for when acute fatal memory suppression (AFMS) should be considered. Was the death itself protracted? (People who were correctly expecting for a prolonged period to die of terminal diseases should almost never have their whole illness suppressed. See this other file.) Relatedly, before the start of the incident that lead to dying, did the person expect they were going to continue living? Did the death involve antagonistic action by another sapient being or an organization? Did it give them reason to believe the danger they were in would persist in a new, disjoint environment?
Once it's been decided that AFMS is appropriate, there's the question of duration. By default, [unfamiliar terms] should [technical jargon] in order to set up a trigger where on considering the question of how they died for more than about five seconds, the resurrectee will be able to remember the answer. This allows for orientation to the environment and generally avoids the worst pitfalls of distress on both the death-memories end and on the not-being-able-to-remember-how-they-died end, naturally. Here's a table of like 50 factors for which different durations are recommended.
After that first divider, there are a couple of studies which are clearly the basis for why these guidelines were put in place. Questionnaire results of 100,000 people 1 week, 1 month, 1 year, 10 years, 50 years after their resurrection; results are not overwhelmingly perfect but yeah, warranted AFMS generally seems to help a lot in the short and medium term and mostly get the effects washed out in the long term, although there's maybe a hint more lasting depression and stuff like that among people who didn't get it. Then: 22 in-depth case studies with interviews from people who got resurrected on "Earth 17" from different points in history and into the year 2043; these end up being substantially about the dissonance between their religious beliefs and the reality of the situation but Journey has apparently selected these ones from a larger pool and they're all at least somewhat about traumatic death and memory suppression. Some of the people had it in situations that are not called for by the modern guidelines and generally found it unnotable, though some of them ranged from kind of annoyed to very upset as a result. Generally, bottom line, though, it seems to do more good then harm in cases called for by the first document.