"Should I begin by summarizing the events in Cheliax that prompted this investigation?"
" - because Her Majesty Aspexia III has chosen to restore the monarchy, marry Cyprian, and retain slavery as an institution, and Andoran's resources must be directed in accordance with the will of the people of Andoran, who consider all three of these to be enormous Evils they will not prop up and assist even to save the souls of the tyrant's free subjects."
"Cotonnet's insistence, I think. If it had been his decision Cheliax would be a free Republic, and Andoran would be honored to give them absolutely any aid in our power. We did have an enormous number of people ask about participating in or assisting with the convention, but they were all refused."
"Redact it from the versions for everyone in Cheliax, but if the Preceptors want it - Cyprian would like a port on the Inner Sea, and one presumes from the fact of their marriage that he and Her Majesty Aspexia III would both like to reunite the Empire, and he cannot reasonably invade Andoran without great provocation. But the people of Andoran regard a neighbor where hundreds of thousands of people live in bondage as, itself, provocation, and so if Cheliax retains slavery a war is inevitable. Anyone who desires that war, then, would be wise to retain slavery."
"The people of Cheliax are scared and they want to be good, and who's their example to blindly and somewhat stupidly copy off? Their Queen, who if she's Good is Good the way Cyprian could've been Good if fate was generous enough to him, by virtue of killing sufficiently many Evil things, who has as far as I can tell provided them no principled account of what moves her at all? The Reclamation, which is fundamentally grounded in all of the most admirable and least imitable, least desirable parts of Iomedaenism? No one likes Andoran's answer to what a good man is. But I don't think they're going to end up being more satisfied with what you get if you studiously refuse to offer any. Especially if you tell your people their rulers are Good and then absolutely at no point show them any hints of what you mean by that, besides 'opposed to Hell' and 'very good at killing things'."
"My own take is that you've got to stack the deck. You've got to do it honorably, you've got to be thoughtful about it, but the point isn't to demonstrate Republicanism can win a fair fight, it's to have free people who know they're free and are pursuing their vision of the Good. I wouldn't've let foreigners in as delegates, or not more than a few of them, but I'd have strongly encouraged them to join on as staff and advisors to the delegates, to draft proposals and write pamphlets..."